In commercial real estate, cheap land is often framed as opportunity.
Lower basis. More upside. Room to be creative.
But increasingly, land that looks inexpensive on paper becomes costly once infrastructure realities are introduced — especially power, utilities, and access. What appears to be a bargain can quietly turn into a long-term drag on feasibility, timelines, and returns.
The truth is simple but often overlooked:
Land is only as valuable as what it can support.
Raw or lightly improved land often carries an attractive price tag because it lacks development readiness. That’s not inherently a problem — unless the missing infrastructure is difficult, slow, or expensive to deliver.
When buyers focus solely on purchase price, they may underestimate:
utility extension costs
power capacity limitations
upgrade timelines
permitting complexity
coordination with multiple agencies
These costs don’t always appear upfront — but they surface eventually, often after capital is committed.
“Cheap land lowers the entry price — not the total cost.”
Infrastructure doesn’t just add cost. It adds time, uncertainty, and sequencing risk.
Power upgrades alone can:
require substation or feeder expansion
involve multi-year utility timelines
trigger redesigns or phased development
delay tenant commitments
Other infrastructure — water, sewer, roads, stormwater — compounds the issue.
Land without infrastructure is not flexible land. It’s conditional land.
In previous cycles, infrastructure could often be solved later. Today, several factors have changed that equation:
higher baseline demand on utilities
longer lead times for materials and labor
stricter permitting and environmental review
competing projects drawing from the same capacity
As a result, infrastructure gaps are harder to “work around” — and much harder to accelerate.
Cheap land can still be a smart strategy if:
infrastructure is nearby and expandable
timelines align with utility delivery
carrying costs are manageable
the end user is flexible
It becomes risky when:
power upgrades are speculative
timelines are undefined
capital is tied up waiting on approvals
project economics rely on best-case assumptions
The difference isn’t land price — it’s infrastructure certainty.
“The cheapest land often carries the most assumptions.”
Sophisticated buyers don’t ask, “How cheap is the land?”
They ask:
What infrastructure exists today?
What’s required to make this site usable?
Who controls the timeline?
What happens if delivery slips?
These questions turn land acquisition into a feasibility exercise — not a pricing exercise.
Land doesn’t fail projects — assumptions do.
Cheap land can be a strategic advantage, but only when infrastructure realities are understood early and underwritten honestly. In today’s environment, the most valuable sites aren’t the cheapest — they’re the ones that can actually move forward.
In commercial real estate, infrastructure turns land into opportunity.
Written from a commercial real estate advisory perspective, focused on feasibility, infrastructure awareness, and long-term value.
Business Facilities — Infrastructure Readiness and Site Selection
LightBox — Utility Constraints and Land Feasibility in Commercial Development
NAIOP — Infrastructure Costs and Industrial Development Risk
Urban Land Institute (ULI) — Infrastructure as a Driver of Land Value
BDO — Power and Utility Considerations in Site Feasibility
Keep reading other bits of knowledge from our team.
Have a question about this article or want to learn more?
